Journal-Times (Grayson, KY)


February 16, 2011

Jailer explains finances and “Bad Cats”

Feb. 16, 2011 —     During the fiscal court meeting on Tuesday there was much talk concerning county, state, and federal inmates at the Carter County Detention Center. I do understand on the surface that people may have concerns over federal inmates. People are typically afraid or cautious of what they do not understand. So I would like to clarify what we do with our inmate population to best serve our prisoners as well as the county taxpayers.

    The detention center typically keeps anywhere between 85-100 county inmates for a variety of charges. Our first obligation is to Carter County and our own prisoners. The remaining beds are used to help offset the counties cost of operating the jail budget. We receive Elliott and Morgan County prisoners at a daily rate of $30. We take State inmates for $32 daily. We are the only facility in the region that is allowed to house federal inmates, for which we receive $42 a day. It is a blessing to our county to have this federal contract. Unlike some counties that put in a million or more dollars out of general funds, Carter County saves hundreds of thousands of dollars by housing these “revenue” prisoners. With that being said, we can save our general and road funds much more by housing more federal inmates than state or other counties at the lower rate.

    There are other counties interested in housing for Elliott, and Morgan already uses Big Sandy more than they do Carter County. If we used our average 30 beds currently used for Elliott County prisoners, and replaced those beds with federal prisoners the county would receive nearly $140,000-150,000 additional revenue to offset our county expense. Another jail in the region that does not have a federal contract would benefit from housing Elliott County’s inmates. So the question that keeps coming up is, “Are the federal inmates more dangerous or problematic than county or state?” The answer is absolutely not.

    Most federal inmates are considered “white collar” crimes such as mail fraud, forgery, or money laundering. Our county inmates are largely drug related and child support. State inmates have most of the violent offenses such as burglary, assault, and murder. Our federal inmates cause very little trouble inside the facility because they have much more over their head and one phone call from the detention center can add six months to a year to their sentence.

    As you can see, it only makes sense to use more of our “revenue” beds to house federal inmates at a higher rate to best offset the county taxpayers “cost” of running the jail. Jails are a necessity, and are mandated by the Kentucky Constitution.

    If we did not have a jail, the cost to taxpayers would be significantly higher to place them outside of Carter County since we do bring in revenue. Also, we can keep our family close as they await court or serve time.

    Having the federal contract is a blessing, and losing it would be devastating to our budget. I suggest we use this blessing to the fullest in order to save Carter County as much money as we can.

Text Only
  • Carter County Community Fund is growing

    Great things are happening as people have been working on so many different ways to improve life in Carter County.

    December 18, 2013

  • Lessons learned at church…by chance

    September 25, 2013

  • The acting comeback that never was

    October 17, 2012

  • Questioning proposed budget cuts

    January 26, 2012

  • Where do we draw the line?

    A question from the audience Monday at a Commerce Lexington luncheon illustrates the philosophical conflict for some of today’s conservative right and even for the public at large.

    April 27, 2011

  • Bi-partisanship the key to penal code reform

    Much has been made of the bi-partisan process which produced the General Assembly’s major reform of the state’s penal code.

    March 9, 2011

  • Senate week in review: Medicaid

    This week, we saw some very good legislation and, unfortunately, some very poor legislation moving through the legislative process. Legislation I strongly opposed dealt with a proposed measure to balance the Medicaid budget. Medicaid needs to be fixed – no doubt about that -- but it needs to be fixed with Medicaid money and not by sacrificing education as well as other state programs and jobs.

    March 9, 2011

  • Landmark legislation revamps corrections

    With little time remaining in the 2011 Regular Session, legislators used their time to amend and act on legislation.

    March 9, 2011

  • Legislative week in review

    There was more than one “somewhat unusual coalition” on display last week in Frankfort. That was the description used by Tom Fitzgerald of the Kentucky Resource Council which advocates on environmental issues and usually represents “the little guy.”

    March 2, 2011

  • Legislative action picks up speed in General Assembly

    With only eleven legislative days remaining in this year’s session, our time was used to act on numerous pieces of legislation this week in order to have enough time for the Senate to consider and approve these bills prior to the ten-day veto period.

    March 2, 2011